https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648 The court concluded that the suit was maintainable against the State without obtaining permission and was filed within the limitation period. A declaratory decree was granted without consequential relief as the plaintiff was in possession. The attachment and auction procedures were found to be invalid due to procedural irregularities. Improper service of notice rendered the auction void, and the plaintiff was presumed to remain in possession. The appeal was partly allowed, declaring the attachment and auction void, prohibiting interference with the plaintiff's possession, and awarding costs to the plaintiff from the State. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:02:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648 The court concluded that the suit was maintainable against the State without obtaining permission and was filed within the limitation period. A declaratory decree was granted without consequential relief as the plaintiff was in possession. The attachment and auction procedures were found to be invalid due to procedural irregularities. Improper service of notice rendered the auction void, and the plaintiff was presumed to remain in possession. The appeal was partly allowed, declaring the attachment and auction void, prohibiting interference with the plaintiff's possession, and awarding costs to the plaintiff from the State. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648