<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 965 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648</link>
    <description>A suit challenging illegal fiscal action was maintainable against the State without prior sanction, but not for personal relief against an officer for acts done under the Act. Limitation was held to run from completion of the auction sale, which occurred only on registration of the sale certificate, so the suit filed soon after was within time. A declaration and perpetual injunction were sustainable without a claim for possession because dispossession was not proved. The attachment and auction were invalid due to defective notice, irregular substituted service, and a non-transparent sale process contrary to law and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 965 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648</link>
      <description>A suit challenging illegal fiscal action was maintainable against the State without prior sanction, but not for personal relief against an officer for acts done under the Act. Limitation was held to run from completion of the auction sale, which occurred only on registration of the sale certificate, so the suit filed soon after was within time. A declaration and perpetual injunction were sustainable without a claim for possession because dispossession was not proved. The attachment and auction were invalid due to defective notice, irregular substituted service, and a non-transparent sale process contrary to law and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>