https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166990 Permission under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act is valid only if the statutory preconditions existed when it was granted, and it can be impeached in execution only on proof of fraud, collusion, or a jurisdictional error going to the root of the Controller's power. Subsequent events, nondisclosure of reasons for short-term letting, or the landlord's later availability of other accommodation do not by themselves vitiate the sanction. On the facts, fraud or collusion was not proved, so the tenant's objection failed and eviction was upheld. en-us Fri, 13 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166990 Permission under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act is valid only if the statutory preconditions existed when it was granted, and it can be impeached in execution only on proof of fraud, collusion, or a jurisdictional error going to the root of the Controller's power. Subsequent events, nondisclosure of reasons for short-term letting, or the landlord's later availability of other accommodation do not by themselves vitiate the sanction. On the facts, fraud or collusion was not proved, so the tenant's objection failed and eviction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166990