https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253621 The Court directed the 3rd respondent to review the petitioner's application regarding the seized amount of Rs. 27,00,000 in accordance with the law and relevant judgments, including Mahesh Choudhary's case. The petitioner was given a timeframe to appear before the respondent for a hearing, with orders to be passed within a specified period. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions and precedents in addressing the treatment of the seized amount for interest calculation under the Income Tax Act. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253621 The Court directed the 3rd respondent to review the petitioner's application regarding the seized amount of Rs. 27,00,000 in accordance with the law and relevant judgments, including Mahesh Choudhary's case. The petitioner was given a timeframe to appear before the respondent for a hearing, with orders to be passed within a specified period. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions and precedents in addressing the treatment of the seized amount for interest calculation under the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253621