<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ignoring judicial discipline and recording conclusions diametrically contrary to judgment of the Tribunal is either illustrative of gross incompetence or clear irresponsible conduct - Revenue to pay litigation costs</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5927</link>
    <description>A final Tribunal judgment carries precedential authority binding on lower quasi judicial authorities even if a departmental appeal failed on limitation. Ignoring or recording conclusions contrary to such a judgment amounts to gross incompetence or quasi judicial misconduct and may attract disciplinary consequences. The Tribunal applied these principles in a classification dispute, found the adjudicating authorities in breach of judicial discipline, imposed a costs payment on the department and directed communication of the Tribunal&#039;s order to senior revenue administration offices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:02:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:02:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ignoring judicial discipline and recording conclusions diametrically contrary to judgment of the Tribunal is either illustrative of gross incompetence or clear irresponsible conduct - Revenue to pay litigation costs</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5927</link>
      <description>A final Tribunal judgment carries precedential authority binding on lower quasi judicial authorities even if a departmental appeal failed on limitation. Ignoring or recording conclusions contrary to such a judgment amounts to gross incompetence or quasi judicial misconduct and may attract disciplinary consequences. The Tribunal applied these principles in a classification dispute, found the adjudicating authorities in breach of judicial discipline, imposed a costs payment on the department and directed communication of the Tribunal&#039;s order to senior revenue administration offices.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:02:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>