<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253612</link>
    <description>The Court emphasized the importance of accurate declarations and timely deposits under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013. It upheld the authorities&#039; decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s declaration due to discrepancies in credit claims. The judgment clarified the mandatory nature of the initial 50% deposit for availing scheme benefits and highlighted the absence of provisions for granting extensions. Additionally, it ruled that the scheme does not allow for post-filing amendments to declarations, emphasizing strict compliance with scheme provisions for immunity from penalties and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 22:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253612</link>
      <description>The Court emphasized the importance of accurate declarations and timely deposits under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013. It upheld the authorities&#039; decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s declaration due to discrepancies in credit claims. The judgment clarified the mandatory nature of the initial 50% deposit for availing scheme benefits and highlighted the absence of provisions for granting extensions. Additionally, it ruled that the scheme does not allow for post-filing amendments to declarations, emphasizing strict compliance with scheme provisions for immunity from penalties and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>