<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253610</link>
    <description>The court determined that the security service provided by the Assam government to tea plantation owners through the Assam Tea Plantation Security Force (ATPSF) and later the AISF constitutes a sovereign function of the State and not a taxable &quot;support service&quot; subject to service tax. Emphasizing the sovereign nature of maintaining peace and security, the court directed the Service Tax Department to assess whether the service falls under support services or sovereign functions before demanding service tax. The judgment clarified the distinction between sovereign functions and support services, quashing the previous notice and providing guidelines for future classification of such services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253610</link>
      <description>The court determined that the security service provided by the Assam government to tea plantation owners through the Assam Tea Plantation Security Force (ATPSF) and later the AISF constitutes a sovereign function of the State and not a taxable &quot;support service&quot; subject to service tax. Emphasizing the sovereign nature of maintaining peace and security, the court directed the Service Tax Department to assess whether the service falls under support services or sovereign functions before demanding service tax. The judgment clarified the distinction between sovereign functions and support services, quashing the previous notice and providing guidelines for future classification of such services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>