<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 926 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253609</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for further evaluation regarding the eligibility of Intellectual Property Rights services for input service credit. The Tribunal needs to re-examine whether these services meet the criteria under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, considering the unique circumstances of the case where commercial production had not yet begun. The appeal was concluded without any cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 926 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253609</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for further evaluation regarding the eligibility of Intellectual Property Rights services for input service credit. The Tribunal needs to re-examine whether these services meet the criteria under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, considering the unique circumstances of the case where commercial production had not yet begun. The appeal was concluded without any cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>