<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 924 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253607</link>
    <description>The court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order as the appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 43(8) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and clarified that the respondent could seek remedy through appropriate proceedings, highlighting the discretionary nature of power under Section 43(8) and the need to protect revenue interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 924 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253607</link>
      <description>The court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order as the appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 43(8) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and clarified that the respondent could seek remedy through appropriate proceedings, highlighting the discretionary nature of power under Section 43(8) and the need to protect revenue interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>