<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 908 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253591</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the stay petition and appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant promptly rectified the drawback serial number error upon notification and that the goods&#039; description was accurate. As a result, the Tribunal deemed it inappropriate to impose the fine and penalty, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 908 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253591</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the stay petition and appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant promptly rectified the drawback serial number error upon notification and that the goods&#039; description was accurate. As a result, the Tribunal deemed it inappropriate to impose the fine and penalty, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>