<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 907 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253590</link>
    <description>The court held that income tax returns and related information are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1) of the Right to Information Act unless larger public interest justifies it. It rejected the Central Information Commission&#039;s decision to disclose the information, emphasizing that assessment proceedings should not be subject to external interference. The court found no evidence of corruption to warrant intervention and reiterated that exemptions under Section 8 should prevail, with disclosure only in exceptional cases of public interest. The petitioners succeeded, and the CIC&#039;s order was overturned, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 907 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253590</link>
      <description>The court held that income tax returns and related information are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1) of the Right to Information Act unless larger public interest justifies it. It rejected the Central Information Commission&#039;s decision to disclose the information, emphasizing that assessment proceedings should not be subject to external interference. The court found no evidence of corruption to warrant intervention and reiterated that exemptions under Section 8 should prevail, with disclosure only in exceptional cases of public interest. The petitioners succeeded, and the CIC&#039;s order was overturned, with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>