<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 903 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs for undisclosed stock, rejecting the claim of forced surrender due to lack of evidence. The Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was restored, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion. However, the deletion of Rs. 20 lakhs based on the lower G.P. rate was upheld by the Tribunal, agreeing with the historical consistency and nature of the business. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, restoring the undisclosed stock addition but dismissing the appeal regarding the G.P. rate addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 903 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 35 lakhs for undisclosed stock, rejecting the claim of forced surrender due to lack of evidence. The Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was restored, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion. However, the deletion of Rs. 20 lakhs based on the lower G.P. rate was upheld by the Tribunal, agreeing with the historical consistency and nature of the business. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, restoring the undisclosed stock addition but dismissing the appeal regarding the G.P. rate addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>