https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Regulation 104(3) of the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations 1977, which prohibits the right to inspection, verification, and revaluation of answer books. The Court emphasized the authority of the regulation-making body in determining examination policies and evaluating performance. It set aside the High Court's decision, stating that the principles of natural justice do not apply to the evaluation process. The Court highlighted the practical difficulties and administrative burden that would arise from allowing inspection and revaluation as a matter of right, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions and allowing the appeals. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Regulation 104(3) of the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations 1977, which prohibits the right to inspection, verification, and revaluation of answer books. The Court emphasized the authority of the regulation-making body in determining examination policies and evaluating performance. It set aside the High Court's decision, stating that the principles of natural justice do not apply to the evaluation process. The Court highlighted the practical difficulties and administrative burden that would arise from allowing inspection and revaluation as a matter of right, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions and allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987