https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987 Broad statutory power to regulate examinations under the parent Act justified regulations treating answer books as confidential, barring disclosure or inspection after results. The Court held that delegated legislation is valid if it stays within the statute and constitutional limits, and the policy choice was not shown to be manifestly unjust or oppressive. The regulations were also upheld insofar as they excluded revaluation: limited verification of marks did not create an implied right to revaluation, and finality, administrative workability, and public interest supported the prohibition. The Board's regulations on verification, confidentiality, and non-revaluation were therefore sustained. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987 Broad statutory power to regulate examinations under the parent Act justified regulations treating answer books as confidential, barring disclosure or inspection after results. The Court held that delegated legislation is valid if it stays within the statute and constitutional limits, and the policy choice was not shown to be manifestly unjust or oppressive. The regulations were also upheld insofar as they excluded revaluation: limited verification of marks did not create an implied right to revaluation, and finality, administrative workability, and public interest supported the prohibition. The Board's regulations on verification, confidentiality, and non-revaluation were therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166987