<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253564</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Court clarified that issuing equity shares at a premium to a non-resident holding company does not fall under Chapter X jurisdiction. The Assessing Officer was directed to proceed with the Assessment Order under Section 143(3) of the Act. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253564</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Court clarified that issuing equity shares at a premium to a non-resident holding company does not fall under Chapter X jurisdiction. The Assessing Officer was directed to proceed with the Assessment Order under Section 143(3) of the Act. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>