<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2011, a settlement application cannot be rejected without proper verification of the applicant&#039;s particulars against relevant records, and fairness requires an opportunity to produce books of account where the computation is unclear. Rejection on that ground was held unsustainable when the authority had not carried out effective scrutiny before refusing the applications. The document also states that a remand of the underlying assessment by a special committee does not, by itself, bar access to the settlement scheme. Accordingly, rejection solely because assessment orders had been set aside and remitted was untenable, and the matters were to be reconsidered under the settlement mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2011, a settlement application cannot be rejected without proper verification of the applicant&#039;s particulars against relevant records, and fairness requires an opportunity to produce books of account where the computation is unclear. Rejection on that ground was held unsustainable when the authority had not carried out effective scrutiny before refusing the applications. The document also states that a remand of the underlying assessment by a special committee does not, by itself, bar access to the settlement scheme. Accordingly, rejection solely because assessment orders had been set aside and remitted was untenable, and the matters were to be reconsidered under the settlement mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>