<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders rejecting the petitioners&#039; applications under the Settlement Act, directing a reconsideration while emphasizing procedural compliance. The court suspended the assessment orders, stressing the need for a fair reassessment with a personal hearing and record verification. The judgment ensures a transparent and statutory-compliant reassessment process for the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders rejecting the petitioners&#039; applications under the Settlement Act, directing a reconsideration while emphasizing procedural compliance. The court suspended the assessment orders, stressing the need for a fair reassessment with a personal hearing and record verification. The judgment ensures a transparent and statutory-compliant reassessment process for the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>