https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253559 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, ruling in favor of the respondent. The appeal by the Revenue regarding the classification of the service tax activity, time bar for demand of service tax, and interpretation of taxable service for Video Tape Production activity was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the respondent's activities did not qualify as 'Advertising Agency' service under the Finance Act, 1994, and that there was no suppression to evade service tax payment, as the respondent had been compliant with filing statutory returns. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253559 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, ruling in favor of the respondent. The appeal by the Revenue regarding the classification of the service tax activity, time bar for demand of service tax, and interpretation of taxable service for Video Tape Production activity was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the respondent's activities did not qualify as 'Advertising Agency' service under the Finance Act, 1994, and that there was no suppression to evade service tax payment, as the respondent had been compliant with filing statutory returns. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253559