<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253558</link>
    <description>The court held that the Writ Petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had already pursued remedies before the Tribunal regarding the service tax issue. The court emphasized that disputed factual questions cannot be raised in a Writ Petition and that classification issues should be adjudicated by the authorities under the Act. Consequently, the Writ Petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 875 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253558</link>
      <description>The court held that the Writ Petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had already pursued remedies before the Tribunal regarding the service tax issue. The court emphasized that disputed factual questions cannot be raised in a Writ Petition and that classification issues should be adjudicated by the authorities under the Act. Consequently, the Writ Petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>