<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 863 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253546</link>
    <description>The appeal concerned substantial questions on confiscation of goods and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962, including the legal effect of Drugs Controller testing, storage in a customs bonded warehouse, claimed exemption under Schedule D of the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Rules, 1945, and the significance of entry through Nhava Sheva port. The HC admitted the appeal on those substantial questions of law and accepted notice on behalf of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 863 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253546</link>
      <description>The appeal concerned substantial questions on confiscation of goods and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962, including the legal effect of Drugs Controller testing, storage in a customs bonded warehouse, claimed exemption under Schedule D of the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Rules, 1945, and the significance of entry through Nhava Sheva port. The HC admitted the appeal on those substantial questions of law and accepted notice on behalf of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>