<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253545</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC admitted the appeal of the Assessee and Revenue. The case involves determining if there was suppression despite evidence submitted by the Respondent in 2003 and 2004, and setting aside the demand for an extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253545</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC admitted the appeal of the Assessee and Revenue. The case involves determining if there was suppression despite evidence submitted by the Respondent in 2003 and 2004, and setting aside the demand for an extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>