<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 857 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253540</link>
    <description>The judgment determined that the conversion of Shipping Bills for Duty Free Goods into Shipping Bill for drawback does not fall within the jurisdiction of a Single Member Bench under Section 129C (4) of the Customs Act, 1962. It was concluded that the matter should be heard by a Division Bench for proper adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in determining the suitable forum for resolving customs-related disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 857 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253540</link>
      <description>The judgment determined that the conversion of Shipping Bills for Duty Free Goods into Shipping Bill for drawback does not fall within the jurisdiction of a Single Member Bench under Section 129C (4) of the Customs Act, 1962. It was concluded that the matter should be heard by a Division Bench for proper adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in determining the suitable forum for resolving customs-related disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>