<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 855 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original revoking the CHA license and ordering forfeiture of the security deposit. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief as the impugned order lacked independent examination and violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal emphasized the need for informing the appellant of reasons for differing with the enquiry report, ultimately leading to the order&#039;s setting aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 855 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original revoking the CHA license and ordering forfeiture of the security deposit. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with consequential relief as the impugned order lacked independent examination and violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal emphasized the need for informing the appellant of reasons for differing with the enquiry report, ultimately leading to the order&#039;s setting aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>