https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253533 The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue, concluding that the deduction under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act was justified. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of Section 32AB, the application of legal precedent from a previous case, and the assessment of compliance with deposit timelines as per the Act's Scheme. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and the relevance of legal precedents in tax cases. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2014 06:33:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253533 The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue, concluding that the deduction under Section 32AB of the Income Tax Act was justified. The decision was influenced by the interpretation of Section 32AB, the application of legal precedent from a previous case, and the assessment of compliance with deposit timelines as per the Act's Scheme. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and the relevance of legal precedents in tax cases. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253533