https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253522 Fresh writ petitions under Article 226 challenging the same assessment orders were held not maintainable where earlier writ petitions had been withdrawn without liberty to file afresh. The earlier liberty was confined to pursuing statutory appeals, so the same cause of action could not be re-agitated in a second writ round. Applying the principle underlying Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, the remedy under Article 226 was treated as abandoned in respect of those assessment orders. The Court also declined discretionary interference, treating the renewed petitions as an abuse of process. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253522 Fresh writ petitions under Article 226 challenging the same assessment orders were held not maintainable where earlier writ petitions had been withdrawn without liberty to file afresh. The earlier liberty was confined to pursuing statutory appeals, so the same cause of action could not be re-agitated in a second writ round. Applying the principle underlying Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, the remedy under Article 226 was treated as abandoned in respect of those assessment orders. The Court also declined discretionary interference, treating the renewed petitions as an abuse of process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253522