<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 834 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the waiver of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court, emphasizing that when a penalty is imposed under Section 78 for suppressing taxable value, imposing an additional penalty under Section 76 may not be justified. This case underscores the significance of carefully assessing and applying different penalty provisions under the Finance Act in tax non-compliance situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 834 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the waiver of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court, emphasizing that when a penalty is imposed under Section 78 for suppressing taxable value, imposing an additional penalty under Section 76 may not be justified. This case underscores the significance of carefully assessing and applying different penalty provisions under the Finance Act in tax non-compliance situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>