<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 under the category of &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The decision was based on the interpretation of the legal provisions governing banking and financial services, specifically regarding bill discounting, and the conclusion that the bill discounting in this case did not attract service tax as it was part of the sale of goods transaction between the buyer and seller, not a separate financial service provided by specified entities. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, halting the recovery of the tax amount during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 under the category of &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The decision was based on the interpretation of the legal provisions governing banking and financial services, specifically regarding bill discounting, and the conclusion that the bill discounting in this case did not attract service tax as it was part of the sale of goods transaction between the buyer and seller, not a separate financial service provided by specified entities. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, halting the recovery of the tax amount during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>