<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for refund of Service Tax on a reverse charge basis, directing the refund with interest. The Tribunal found the show-cause notice issued by the Revenue to be misconceived and vitiated, ultimately setting it aside and directing the refund to the appellant. The Tribunal also held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim was irrelevant in this context due to the flawed nature of the show-cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for refund of Service Tax on a reverse charge basis, directing the refund with interest. The Tribunal found the show-cause notice issued by the Revenue to be misconceived and vitiated, ultimately setting it aside and directing the refund to the appellant. The Tribunal also held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim was irrelevant in this context due to the flawed nature of the show-cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>