<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 829 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253512</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand against the appellant for providing cargo handling service, citing precedents and statutory definitions. Activities involving hiring equipment for loading coal were deemed as falling under cargo handling service rather than transport of goods by road service. The Hon&#039;ble Orissa High Court&#039;s decision in a similar case supported this classification, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 829 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253512</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand against the appellant for providing cargo handling service, citing precedents and statutory definitions. Activities involving hiring equipment for loading coal were deemed as falling under cargo handling service rather than transport of goods by road service. The Hon&#039;ble Orissa High Court&#039;s decision in a similar case supported this classification, leading to the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>