<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 815 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant for importing goods without a Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate. It emphasized that the importer&#039;s compliance with conditions for importation should not be penalized for the exporter&#039;s violations, especially when no prohibited items were imported. The decision aligned with previous judgments and highlighted the importance of 100% inspection in cases of non-compliance with stipulated conditions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on precedent and adherence to inspection requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 815 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant for importing goods without a Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate. It emphasized that the importer&#039;s compliance with conditions for importation should not be penalized for the exporter&#039;s violations, especially when no prohibited items were imported. The decision aligned with previous judgments and highlighted the importance of 100% inspection in cases of non-compliance with stipulated conditions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on precedent and adherence to inspection requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>