https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253467 The Tribunal upheld the denial of duty remission for stolen goods, focusing on correct duty quantification and interest rate. Duty was confirmed on the stolen final product's value, not on imported components. Penalties were not initially imposed, leading to the rejection of appeals on penalties. The judgment emphasized distinguishing duty on components and stolen goods, affirming duty confirmation on the stolen goods' value. en-us Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253467 The Tribunal upheld the denial of duty remission for stolen goods, focusing on correct duty quantification and interest rate. Duty was confirmed on the stolen final product's value, not on imported components. Penalties were not initially imposed, leading to the rejection of appeals on penalties. The judgment emphasized distinguishing duty on components and stolen goods, affirming duty confirmation on the stolen goods' value. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253467