<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 783 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that manufacturers are liable to pay interest on the differential duty from the month succeeding the due date until the date of payment, even if the duty was paid before the formal finalization order. Previous judgments cited were considered per incuriam as they did not analyze the rules and subsequent judgments. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, affirming the obligation to pay interest on the outstanding duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 783 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that manufacturers are liable to pay interest on the differential duty from the month succeeding the due date until the date of payment, even if the duty was paid before the formal finalization order. Previous judgments cited were considered per incuriam as they did not analyze the rules and subsequent judgments. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, affirming the obligation to pay interest on the outstanding duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>