<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 781 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253464</link>
    <description>The Court held that the disputed part of Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules was invalid. Interest on delayed payment should be calculated at a flat rate of two per cent per month or twenty-four per cent per annum, in line with statutory provisions. Demand notices were quashed as petitioners had paid interest at the correct rate. Petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 781 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253464</link>
      <description>The Court held that the disputed part of Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules was invalid. Interest on delayed payment should be calculated at a flat rate of two per cent per month or twenty-four per cent per annum, in line with statutory provisions. Demand notices were quashed as petitioners had paid interest at the correct rate. Petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>