<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 778 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253461</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act and restored the penalty imposed by the Original Authority. The Court held that once the conditions for applying Section 11AC are met, the penalty must be equal to the duty determined under Section 11A. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the Revenue was allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 778 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253461</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act and restored the penalty imposed by the Original Authority. The Court held that once the conditions for applying Section 11AC are met, the penalty must be equal to the duty determined under Section 11A. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the Revenue was allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>