<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold additions under section 69A for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, as the assessee failed to provide concrete evidence to explain discrepancies in cash deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the necessity of substantiating claims with verifiable evidence in tax proceedings to avoid adverse tax implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold additions under section 69A for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, as the assessee failed to provide concrete evidence to explain discrepancies in cash deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the necessity of substantiating claims with verifiable evidence in tax proceedings to avoid adverse tax implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>