<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 760 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253443</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add Rs. 30,04,500 as undisclosed income for AY 2004-05. The tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate the source of income and provide sufficient evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding a disputed settlement, the tribunal concluded that the lack of concrete evidence resulted in upholding the addition of undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 760 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253443</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add Rs. 30,04,500 as undisclosed income for AY 2004-05. The tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s failure to substantiate the source of income and provide sufficient evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding a disputed settlement, the tribunal concluded that the lack of concrete evidence resulted in upholding the addition of undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>