<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 972 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the payment of duty on capital goods used for a certain period. The Tribunal relied on precedent set in Cummins India Ltd. v. CCE, where it was held that duty should be paid on the transaction value at the time of clearance of capital goods, even after extended use. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s argument and affirmed the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), emphasizing the importance of consistent interpretation and application of relevant rules in tax disputes involving capital goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 972 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the payment of duty on capital goods used for a certain period. The Tribunal relied on precedent set in Cummins India Ltd. v. CCE, where it was held that duty should be paid on the transaction value at the time of clearance of capital goods, even after extended use. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s argument and affirmed the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), emphasizing the importance of consistent interpretation and application of relevant rules in tax disputes involving capital goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>