<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 755 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax paid erroneously without legal authority was eligible for a refund. The Tribunal held that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 did not apply in this case. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, directing the adjudicating authority to implement the order within thirty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 755 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, stating that the service tax paid erroneously without legal authority was eligible for a refund. The Tribunal held that Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 did not apply in this case. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, directing the adjudicating authority to implement the order within thirty days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>