<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 738 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original confirming a customs duty demand of Rs. 95,92,213, goods confiscation valued at Rs. 1,07,71,002, a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh, and a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the appellant. The appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of compliance with post-importation conditions of providing free treatment, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the duty demand. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the belated duty demand, emphasizing the continuing obligation under Notification 64/88-Cus. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the redemption fine and penalties imposed as reasonable and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 738 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original confirming a customs duty demand of Rs. 95,92,213, goods confiscation valued at Rs. 1,07,71,002, a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh, and a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the appellant. The appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of compliance with post-importation conditions of providing free treatment, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the duty demand. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the belated duty demand, emphasizing the continuing obligation under Notification 64/88-Cus. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the redemption fine and penalties imposed as reasonable and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>