<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 728 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the royalty and technical service fee claims and to rework the reimbursement costs with a 5% markup. The imposition of interest under section 234B was considered consequential, and the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 19.11.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:27:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 728 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the royalty and technical service fee claims and to rework the reimbursement costs with a 5% markup. The imposition of interest under section 234B was considered consequential, and the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 19.11.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>