<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 712 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253395</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal addressed an appeal against a service tax demand confirmation with penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the reversal of credit for exempted services and compliance with Notification 1/2006-ST was upheld. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper credit reversal to fulfill the non-availment condition for exemptions. Due to the lack of details in the appellant&#039;s reversal submission, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further scrutiny. Ultimately, the tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, dismissing the department&#039;s application for early hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 712 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253395</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal addressed an appeal against a service tax demand confirmation with penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the reversal of credit for exempted services and compliance with Notification 1/2006-ST was upheld. The tribunal emphasized the importance of proper credit reversal to fulfill the non-availment condition for exemptions. Due to the lack of details in the appellant&#039;s reversal submission, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further scrutiny. Ultimately, the tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, dismissing the department&#039;s application for early hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>