https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391 Disputed CENVAT credit on services such as architect, interior designer, construction, mandap and catering, photography, pandal and shamiana, club or association, interior decorators and works contract services was found to be prima facie supported by existing precedent treating such services as input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, together with invoices and other records. On that basis, a fairly good case for interim protection was made out, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the adjudicated credit, interest and penalty was stayed pending appeal. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391 Disputed CENVAT credit on services such as architect, interior designer, construction, mandap and catering, photography, pandal and shamiana, club or association, interior decorators and works contract services was found to be prima facie supported by existing precedent treating such services as input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, together with invoices and other records. On that basis, a fairly good case for interim protection was made out, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the adjudicated credit, interest and penalty was stayed pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391