https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of cenvat credit on various services, including construction, after-sales, photography, and catering services. The appellants successfully argued that these services qualified for cenvat credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, supported by judicial pronouncements and detailed submissions. The Tribunal recognized the appellants' case as compelling, waiving the pre-deposit of liabilities and staying recovery pending appeal, citing relevant case laws like Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd V/s. CCE-2009 and Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd V/s. CCE-2011. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of cenvat credit on various services, including construction, after-sales, photography, and catering services. The appellants successfully argued that these services qualified for cenvat credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, supported by judicial pronouncements and detailed submissions. The Tribunal recognized the appellants' case as compelling, waiving the pre-deposit of liabilities and staying recovery pending appeal, citing relevant case laws like Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd V/s. CCE-2009 and Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd V/s. CCE-2011. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253391