<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253379</link>
    <description>The appellants, engaged in Technical Testing and Analysis Services, faced demands for customs and central excise duties. The issue centered on their eligibility for exemption under specific notifications by exporting services as required. The compliance with Rule 3 of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 was crucial, focusing on the nature of services provided and adherence to conditions. The limitation on the show cause notice for customs and excise duties was also examined. The judgment favored the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit of dues and granting a stay against recovery, based on their arguments and legal interpretations, resulting in a favorable outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253379</link>
      <description>The appellants, engaged in Technical Testing and Analysis Services, faced demands for customs and central excise duties. The issue centered on their eligibility for exemption under specific notifications by exporting services as required. The compliance with Rule 3 of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 was crucial, focusing on the nature of services provided and adherence to conditions. The limitation on the show cause notice for customs and excise duties was also examined. The judgment favored the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit of dues and granting a stay against recovery, based on their arguments and legal interpretations, resulting in a favorable outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>