<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 693 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253376</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. The court ruled that the waiver of the term loan did not qualify as a trading liability under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the factual circumstances and legal precedents indicating that the loan waiver did not result in income directly arising from business activity. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 693 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253376</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2004-05. The court ruled that the waiver of the term loan did not qualify as a trading liability under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the factual circumstances and legal precedents indicating that the loan waiver did not result in income directly arising from business activity. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>