<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 687 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded all issues back to the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, finding that the CIT(A) had not properly considered the facts and material presented by the Revenue. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:27:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 687 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded all issues back to the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, finding that the CIT(A) had not properly considered the facts and material presented by the Revenue. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>