<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 682 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253365</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition under section 69C for unexplained expenditure, remanding the issues of depreciation on renovation and bad debts for fresh consideration, and allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation and higher depreciation rate on software expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 682 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253365</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition under section 69C for unexplained expenditure, remanding the issues of depreciation on renovation and bad debts for fresh consideration, and allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation and higher depreciation rate on software expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>