<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253355</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, stating the appellant was entitled to the refund claim, subject to the deduction of interest liability. The decision emphasized correct availing of CENVAT credits, the double payment issue, and unjust enrichment principles concerning duty liability passing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253355</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, stating the appellant was entitled to the refund claim, subject to the deduction of interest liability. The decision emphasized correct availing of CENVAT credits, the double payment issue, and unjust enrichment principles concerning duty liability passing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>