https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253352 Existing Supreme Court decisions remain binding until overruled, and a mere reference to a larger Bench does not suspend their operation or require every connected matter to be kept in abeyance. Applying that principle, the CESTAT was entitled to decide the appeal on the law then in force, including the ruling that inputs used as fuel are not eligible for Cenvat credit under Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The challenge accordingly disclosed no substantial question of law, and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:47:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253352 Existing Supreme Court decisions remain binding until overruled, and a mere reference to a larger Bench does not suspend their operation or require every connected matter to be kept in abeyance. Applying that principle, the CESTAT was entitled to decide the appeal on the law then in force, including the ruling that inputs used as fuel are not eligible for Cenvat credit under Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The challenge accordingly disclosed no substantial question of law, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253352