<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253351</link>
    <description>The Court found the appeals to be infructuous and disposed of them without costs, as the respondent had repaid the refunded amount to the Department after the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rendering the appeals moot. The central issue of entitlement to the refunded amounts based on the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s orders, subsequently set aside by higher authorities, was resolved by the respondent&#039;s repayment, making the relief sought in the appeals irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253351</link>
      <description>The Court found the appeals to be infructuous and disposed of them without costs, as the respondent had repaid the refunded amount to the Department after the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rendering the appeals moot. The central issue of entitlement to the refunded amounts based on the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s orders, subsequently set aside by higher authorities, was resolved by the respondent&#039;s repayment, making the relief sought in the appeals irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>