https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253347 Repeated adjournments and inaction by departmental authorities justified a direction for expeditious compliance with the Tribunal's earlier orders on the refund claim. The Tribunal noted that the refund issue had already been examined in the underlying proceedings and that the departmental stand was inconsistent with earlier orders in similar matters. To prevent further delay, it directed the Commissioner to dispose of the refund claim within 15 days, with contempt proceedings indicated in the event of non-compliance. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253347 Repeated adjournments and inaction by departmental authorities justified a direction for expeditious compliance with the Tribunal's earlier orders on the refund claim. The Tribunal noted that the refund issue had already been examined in the underlying proceedings and that the departmental stand was inconsistent with earlier orders in similar matters. To prevent further delay, it directed the Commissioner to dispose of the refund claim within 15 days, with contempt proceedings indicated in the event of non-compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253347