<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253346</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against a Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal order regarding the admissibility of input credit for various services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was dismissed. The question of whether services like Medical Group Insurance, Consultancy Services, Outdoor Catering Services, Subscription for International Taxation, Advertisement Service &amp;amp; Sponsorship Service qualified as &quot;input service&quot; was analyzed. Previous decisions supported the admissibility of most services, except Advertisement and Sponsorship Services, which were referred back for further consideration. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253346</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against a Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal order regarding the admissibility of input credit for various services under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was dismissed. The question of whether services like Medical Group Insurance, Consultancy Services, Outdoor Catering Services, Subscription for International Taxation, Advertisement Service &amp;amp; Sponsorship Service qualified as &quot;input service&quot; was analyzed. Previous decisions supported the admissibility of most services, except Advertisement and Sponsorship Services, which were referred back for further consideration. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>