<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 641 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253324</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) and employees&#039; contributions towards P.F. and ESIC, ruling in favor of the Department. The Court relied on previous decisions and legal interpretations, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines and requirements for tax deductions and contributions. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the disallowances were dismissed, and the judgment provided clarity on the application of relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 641 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253324</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) and employees&#039; contributions towards P.F. and ESIC, ruling in favor of the Department. The Court relied on previous decisions and legal interpretations, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines and requirements for tax deductions and contributions. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging the disallowances were dismissed, and the judgment provided clarity on the application of relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>