<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 640 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding that Section 14A could not be applied in the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal found the AO erred in making disallowances under Section 14A. The deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) was upheld, while the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=369144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 640 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, holding that Section 14A could not be applied in the absence of exempt income. The Tribunal found the AO erred in making disallowances under Section 14A. The deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) was upheld, while the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>